Quote for the Day

The other frequently employed term for God’s great enemy is diabolos (“devil”), a title that means “slanderer.” John’s use of the term (John 8:44) followed by the epithet “father of lies” captures the slanderous, accusatory tone. Michael Heiser

Charges Dropped Against Christian Woman Arrested After Silently Praying in Her Head Outside Clinic — but She Plans to Continue the Battle

 

Photo: Alliance Defending Freedom UK

U.K. authorities have dropped charges against a charity worker who was criminally charged for praying near an abortion clinic, but her case might be far from over.

Listen to the latest episode of CBN’s Quick Start podcast 👇

Crown Prosecution Service’s (CPS) charges against Isabel Vaughan-Spruce have been dismissed, but she has no plans of stepping away from the legal battle.

According to a press release from her attorneys with Alliance Defending Freedom UK, Vaughan-Spruce “will continue to await justice as she states her intention to pursue full dismissal of her charges.”

Uncertainty as to her legal rights has led the charity worker to fear potential new charges or legal issues moving forward, so she’s looking for a “clear verdict in court.”

“Given the nature of Vaughan-Spruce’s regular voluntary work in offering charitable support to women in crisis pregnancies near abortion facilities, the discontinuance has left her with significant legal unclarity moving forward, given that CPS made clear that the charges ‘may well start again’ in the near future subject to further evidential review,” the statement reads.

As CBN News previously reported, Vaughan-Spruce, the director of the UK March for Life, was arrested in Birmingham, England, this past December after she said she “might” be silently praying when questioned as to why she was standing on a public street near an abortion clinic.

Vaughan-Spruce was reportedly silent before police approached her and had no signage in her hands. Her offense? According to CBN News, authorities received complaints from an onlooker who suspected she was praying silently in her mind in a so-called “censorship zone.”

Video of her police encounter went viral and sparked an international reaction. Vaughan-Spruce can be seen in the clip interacting with police and explaining she “might” be praying in her head but isn’t protesting. “You’re under arrest,” a cop proclaims in the viral video before detaining her.

The City of Birmingham maintains buffer zones around abortion clinics; these designations render it illegal for people to engage “in any act of approval or disapproval” surrounding abortion, including through “verbal or written means, prayer or counseling.”

Through Vaughan-Spruce’s ADF UK attorneys, she explained why she’s forging on to seek a more definitive conclusion clarifying her legal rights.

“It can’t be right that I was arrested and made a criminal, only for praying in my head on a public street,” she said. “So-called ‘buffer zone legislation’ will result in so many more people like me, doing good and legal activities like offering charitable support to women in crisis pregnancies, or simply praying in their heads, being treated like criminals and even facing court.”

Vaughan-Spruce said she wants to be able to continue her pro-life charity work and, in order do to so, she wants to have a clear legal status.

“Many of us need an answer as to whether it’s still lawful to pray silently in our own heads,” she continued. “That’s why I’ll be pursuing a verdict regarding my charges in court.”

 

Quote for the Day

The proper personal name “Satan,” a transliteration of the Hebrew noun śāṭān, occurs thirty-six times in the New Testament, just under half of which are found in the four Gospels.1 Satan is said to have a kingdom (Matt 12:26; Luke 11:18), a detail which presumes an exalted ruling status. Michael Heiser

No to self-identification: Leading Biologist

From the Good Sauce:

 

The Queensland Labor government is hell-bent on allowing people to change facts on their birth certificates.

But renowned biologist Peter Koopman has warned politicians not to rush through a transgender rights law when, as he points out, they are conflating sex (biology) with gender (ideology) and it will have damaging consequences.

Self-identification leads to the abuse of women’s sex-based rights, not to mention laws that rely on lies and falsehoods instead of truth and fact:

The renowned biologist Peter Koopman has warned politicians not to rush through a transgender rights law which he says conflates the fixed scientific category of biological sex with the changeable social construct of gender.

 

Shortly before Australia’s summer holidays, the Labor government in the state of Queensland introduced a draft law that would enable people aged 16 and older to change the “record of sex” on their birth certificate. The law would also allow children aged 12 to 15 to make this change against parental opposition or even without parents being notified of the proposed change, if a court so decides and “a developmentally-informed practitioner” supports the child.

Professor Koopman presented evidence to the Legal Affairs and Safety Committee of Queensland’s parliament, giving his professional opinion about self-identification and gender identity.

“The key problem, from my professional point of view, is [that the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Bill 2022] is flawed because it tries to conflate sex and gender, [to] put them all in the same lump — they’re not, they’re totally separate concepts,” he said.

 

“Sex has a very specific scientific and biological meaning that is essentially fixed.”

 

“Sex is a fundamental biological descriptor of an organism of a person, as fundamental as the species,” he said.

 

“Gender is something entirely different. It’s a psychosocial construct. It’s a much more fluid construct, it’s open to self-identification.” 

Professor Koopman said the proposed law and consequences have not been thought through properly and women will be the losers.

Binary spokeswoman Kirralie Smith said self-identification laws are based on lies:

“It is a lie to claim a man can become a woman.

 

“It is utterly false to change someone’s historical fact at birth. Official identity documents need to relay facts, not feelings, personality expressions or preferences.

 

“Adults can present themselves however they like but it doesn’t change biological facts.

 

“Records must be relied upon as truthful, not lies to appease someone’s feelings.”

This article was originally published here.

Christians And Tattoos

Over the last couple of decades there has been an explosion of body decoration such as tattoos, piercings and much more.
With so many people getting tattoos, the question arises of whether tattoos are acceptable for christians.
The short answer is that it is complicated. Personally I think christians shouldn’t get tattoos for reasons I will go into below but there is no clear Biblical ban on tattooing. For that reason, I am not going to condemn anybody with a tattoo, but I think we need to exercise caution.
There is also a distinction between a man who gets tattoos of the names of children that he in not allowed to see, and someone covered in demonic representations. Many grey areas exist.

Scriptures About Tattoos

Leviticus 19:28 says this: “Do not cut your bodies for the dead, and do not mark your skin with tattoos. I am the Lord.” That seems pretty definitive.
If you look at the previous verse, it says: “Do not trim off the hair on your temples or trim your beards.” That means that to be consistent, christian men who are opposed to tattoos should not shave.
I believe that Leviticus 19:28 relates to practices in some of the cultures around Israel in which cutting the flesh and inking the skin were part of the worship of their false gods. In that sense it is a cultural issue rather than a spiritual issue.
Apart from this single verse in Leviticus there is no single verse prohibiting tattoos, so let us look at some principles.

Occultic Context of Tattoos


There is a strong connection between tattoos and the occult. If you look at the tattoos carried by many people or the catalogues of tattoo artists, you will find many representations of satan or demons. The culture is to say the least “dark,” if not demonic.
Even some of the seemingly innocent or even “pretty” pictures can carry a demonic message.
Take the harmless image below:

We are told that it is a symbol of the strong, independent woman. The graphic is meant to represent the female reproductive organs.
It is called a succubus, which in medieval theology represented a demon that sought sexual relationships with men to corrupt and captivate them into spiritual bondage. Here is what a web-site dedicated to tattoo culture says:

A popular design among women, the meaning behind a succubus tattoo is to embrace the dark and misunderstood parts of oneself.

Their power comes from their demonic and erotic nature, and usually in most tales they were either portrayed as female demons who sucked the life out of men or angels who tempted mortals with beauty so they could destroy them by distracting them from their faith.

https://mytatouage.com/succubus-tattoo-meaning-and-symbolism/

Other examples of succubus tattoos are:

Why would any christian, a child of God, want a representation of demons on their body?

Drawing Attention To Self


For many people, the intention of getting tattoos is to draw attention to themselves. While individuals may deny that this is their intention, the reality is that they want to be noticed. A person might say “I just like the way it looks,” but this is just begging the question of why they want it on their skin. Why not just print it and hang it on their wall?
In an era when many people feel insignificant and lost in the crowd of anonymity in the city, a tattoo might make a person feel different or unique. We want people to notice us because their attention gives us some significance, no matter how fleeting.
As christians, we are not supposed to draw attention to ourselves. Our lives are supposed to be about honouring Jesus, not seeking honour for ourselves.
While tattoos were not an issue for the early church, how people adorned themselves, particularly women, was an issue. The cultural drive to be accepted and noticed was there as much as it is now.

In 1 Peter 3:3-5 we read:

The application of this passage is that God wants us all, men and women, to be focused on letting the inner beauty of our spirit be what people see rather than the outward appearance. We make ourselves beautiful by surrendering to God, trusting in him and relating to our spouse and other family members in a way that glorifies the Lord.


Wise Stewardship of Money

A small tattoo typically costs $300 while a sleeve might cost up to $6000, according to a web site that compares prices in different cities in Australia.
We live in a wealthy society, and for many people these are not big costs. Why not indulge ourselves?
Christians are not owners of money, they are stewards or managers of God’s money. The cost of that small tattoo might have sponsored a Compassion child for half a year, helped to feed a homeless person or met some other worthy need.
When Jesus said “You will always have the poor among you,” he did not say, “so go and use that money on a cool tatt.” He concluded the statement with “but you will not always have me” (Matthew 26:11).
Our responsibility is to ensure that our limited resources are to be used to glorify Jesus.
This does not mean that God does not want us to spend money on fun or frivolous things. We need to remember that whatever we own is not just for us to use as we want.

Conclusion

There is no condemnation for christians who have tattoos, and there should be no judgement either.
There is no black and white answer to the question “Should I get a tattoo?”
Because there is a measure of freedom in this area, christians should pray sincerely seeking the will of the Lord before they make any decisions. They should ask the Holy Spirit to search their hearts, and be very discerning about the spiritual dimensions of marking their bodies with potentially demonic images.