I have seen the Lord
Month: March 2025
Stop Digital ID – Demand the Coalition Repeal It!
George Robert Christensen started this petition to Peter Dutton, and the Liberal National Coalition leadership team – 2024/07/16
Our Freedom is on the Line – Act NOW!
The Digital ID system is one of the most dangerous threats to our personal freedoms in modern Australian history. The Albanese Labor Government rushed this legislation through Parliament, silencing debate and ignoring widespread public opposition. If we don’t act now, Australians will be forced into a government-controlled digital identity regime that could restrict access to essential services, increase surveillance, and open the door to mass data breaches and abuse.
This is why we need the Liberal National Coalition to take a firm stand BEFORE the federal election.
The Digital ID Act Must Be Repealed – No Replacements, No Compromise!
Labor wants a permanent digital identity system that will track and control Australians’ access to daily life. This cannot be allowed to happen. We are demanding that the Liberal National Coalition leadership and marginal MPs publicly commit to:
✅ Repealing the Digital ID Act 2024 and its associated legislation if elected.
✅ Rejecting ANY future Digital ID system – no rebranded replacements, no second attempts.
✅ Making this an ironclad pre-election commitment, not just vague political rhetoric.
Why This Fight Matters
🔴 Erosion of Privacy & Freedom – The Digital ID system gives the government and corporations sweeping control over your data, your access to services, and even your daily activities.
🔴 Government Surveillance & Overreach – Once this system is in place, it will be expanded to monitor and control more aspects of our lives, just as we’ve seen with authoritarian regimes worldwide.
🔴 Security Risks & Data Breaches – The government cannot even secure its own sensitive data. Centralizing every Australian’s identity information creates a massive target for cyberattacks and identity fraud.
Time is Running Out – We Must Act NOW!
The next federal election is our chance to force the Opposition to take a real stand. If we allow weak, half-hearted commitments, the door remains open for a future government to expand and entrench Digital ID.
The Liberal National Coalition MUST publicly commit before the election to repealing Digital ID and ensuring no replacement system is ever introduced.
We need to make this issue politically unavoidable for every Liberal and National MP in a marginal seat. Their election chances depend on voters like us – and we must make it clear that failing to act will have consequences at the ballot box.
SIGN THE PETITION NOW – Demand the LNP Pledge to Repeal Digital ID!
God proved His love…
Quote for the Day
The Word of God is given for our instruction. In receiving it, we become equipped, empowered, and directed to a lifestyle that displays and fulfills the will of God on earth. Bill Johnson et al
Put it into practice…
No Matter What They Call It, Abortion is Killing a Baby
From LifeNews.com
Recently, I have noticed a trend among young pro-abortion advocates that is concerning. They have set their sights on changing the definition of abortion. By making subtle changes, they seek to dramatically broaden the definition and application of the word. If successful, this linguistic attack would pose significant threats to the unborn and their mothers by blurring the lines between abortion and legitimate medical care.
Abortion is correctly defined by the American Academy of Pro-Life OBGYNs as “any drug, device, or procedure used to ensure the death of the human being in utero before, during, or in the process of separation of the mother and her embryo or fetus.”
Please follow LifeNews.com on Gab for the latest pro-life news and info, free from social media censorship.
Within the broad national conversation on abortion, the colloquial version of this definition has been more or less accepted. We all know that a cesarean section is not an abortion. We all know a miscarriage is not an abortion. When legislation is debated in the public square, we all operate under this common understanding.
So what, then, are abortion advocates trying to change? They want to broaden the understanding of abortion to include any procedure that ends pregnancy. This was on display in a viral video featured on the Jubilee YouTube page, where a young abortion advocate debated Ben Shapiro and claimed that cesarean sections are abortions. However, this strategy is not limited only to younger pro-abortion advocates.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) policy on abortion states, “People should be able to access abortion care where and when they need it, including for such purposes as abortion care, miscarriage management, and perinatal palliative care.” [emphasis added]
ACOG has tragically become a shameless promoter of abortion. Now, they claim that caring for a woman who has had a miscarriage is “abortion care.” Equally sinister is the claim that perinatal palliative care falls under the umbrella of abortion.
Broadening the scope of the word “abortion” to include non-abortions is dangerous to mothers and their babies.
Take, for example, a woman who lives in a state with strong pro-life protections. If she is told that her state has outlawed abortion and that abortion includes miscarriage care, she may be misled into believing that miscarriage care is not legal. Often perception becomes reality, and if women believe they cannot legally access legitimate medical care the consequences could prove devastating.
In addition, this shifting of definitions could impact existing legislation, causing confusion and litigation. Women and their babies deserve to be told the truth. Changing the definitions of words does them a great disservice by muddying the waters of legitimate medical care.
Your consolation brings me joy…
Quote for the Day
Jesus Christ is the fullest and most precise revelation of the Father and His nature that could ever be made known. Bill Johnson et al
Keep in step with the Spirit…
Reflection on Matthew 21:33-46
Scripture
“Anyone who stumbles over that stone will be broken to pieces and it will crush anyone it falls on.”
Observation
Jesus tells a parable about a landowner who plants a vineyard and then makes various improvements to the property. He leases the vineyard to some share farmers. At harvest time, he sends servants to collect his share, but the tenants beat up the servants. He sends a bigger group of servants and finally his son, but they kill them all. Finally, he sends an army to kill the evil farmers.
Jesus says that the kingdom will be taken away from the priests and teachers and given to a nation that will produce good fruit. The priests and Pharisees realise that Jesus is speaking His stories against them. They want to arrest him but they dare not because of the crowds.
Application
This is one of those hard sayings that commentators either slide past or offer contradictory explanations.
The basic issues concern, the identity of “that stone.” Does it refer to Christ himself who is the stone the Builders rejected, or is it His statement that the kingdom will be taken from the religious leaders to be given to a new nation, a new kind of people.
In either case, we have a choice, we can come to Christ or the warning of the Kingdom being taken as broken people, repentant people. Or else we can be crushed by God’s judgement.
This is always the choice that Jesus offers people: turn away from your sins and follow me. for the kingdom of God is here.
Are you in or out? There is no middle of the road position.
Prayer
Lord, thank you for opening the kingdom of God to everyone who will repent. Amen.
New Life Narrabri 