The Cricket Scandal

The news reports have been full of the cricket cheating scandal for a week now.

Many people have commented about the issue. The overwhelming response is disappointment and anger at the cricket team.

That’s the surprise for me. When we are daily bombarded with the poor behaviour of politicians, footballers, celebrities, and the banks why would we expect anything else?

We have abandoned any basis for morality with the rejection of christianity and the embrace of secular humanism. The overwhelming popular morality is “It’s OK if nobody gets hurt.”

Nobody got hurt with the ball tampering plot, so what’s wrong? Cricket Australia tried to avoid the “c” word- cheat.

Nobody got hurt when Barnaby Joyce traded in his wife for a younger model- except for his wife and daughters of course, but people move on.

In both cases some people have claimed that the original “sins” were compounded by lying and covering up. Really? We get upset about lies in a post-truth age? Sandpaper or yellow tape, really who cares?

We do care, because deep down we know that there are objective standards of moral behaviour, right and wrong. We might give ourselves a free pass with our own faults, but we expect better of our “betters”.

God has set some rules that are universally applicable. Don’t cheat. Don’t lie. Don’t steal. Don’t murder. Don’t commit adultery.

On the eve of Good Friday some commentators are starting to come around to the idea of forgiveness and redemption.  Real redemption only comes from the cross of Christ and only after we acknowledge our own sin.

There’s the rub. We want forgiveness without repentance from sins we don’t acknowledge and a saviour we refuse to believe in. We think others should set a better example without thinking the same should be true of ourselves.

So after a four day long weekend we will be ready for next week’s scandal and asking ourselves again, “How can this be happening?”

Remember when the Windies were invincible?

Sad day for one of cricket’s great teams.

From the ABC:

Cricket World Cup: Loss to Ireland marks latest evidence of decline of West Indies cricket

Posted about 2 hours agoTue 17 Feb 2015, 11:08am

Darren Sammy needed treatment on his back, Andre Russell pulled up after bowling an embarrassing long-hop while fresh-faced captain Jason Holder speared a ball so wide that first slip was placed in immediate peril.

In three crude snapshots, the decline of West Indies cricket was perfectly captured and another miserable low point – a four-wicket defeat by Ireland at the World Cup on Monday – racked up.

Forty years ago, the West Indies won the first World Cup and then defended it four years later before finishing runners-up in 1983.

Since then, their one-day pickings have been mighty slim, a Champions Trophy victory in 2004 and a Twenty20 world title in 2012.

While this is the latest blow to the West Indies’ legacy, many believe the Caribbean game’s heart stopped beating a long time ago.

Clive Lloyd skippered the West Indies to their 1975 and 1979 world titles and is now the head of selectors.

We are small islands and if you get a whole host of money, you are a king. This T20 competition has messed our cricket up.

West Indies head of selectors Clive Lloyd

He believes the lucrative Twenty20, the sport’s shortest format, has diluted the talent pool, narrowed concentration and diminished skills.

“The players earn a good wage. They have the choice to play Test cricket or T20,” Lloyd said.

“We are small islands and if you get a whole host of money, you are a king. This T20 competition has messed our cricket up.

“We have contracts, probably not as exorbitant as others, but they are getting good money. It doesn’t seem playing for our country is paramount where these players are concerned.”

Full story here