Stop Your Whining

Australians grizzling about the awful “cut to the bone” budget need to think aobut this comparison with our neighbour New Zealand.

The culmination of almost two decades of mainly populist budgets, the Abbott government will spend $6200 a person on cash welfare next year, over 25 per cent more than New Zealand’s government will on each of its citizens (converting all amounts to Australian dollars).

Education spending, at $2900 a person, is 10 per cent more generous in Australia but health expenditure is torrential by comparison: Australian state and federal governments will lavish more than $4600 a person to keep Australians alive and healthy, almost 50 per cent more than is spent in New Zealand…

Australia’s population of 23.5 million is about 5.2 times New Zealand’s, but as of June last year we had 8.4 times as many public servants…

If the federal government overnight reduced welfare, health and education spending to New Zealand levels it would be rolling in a $40 billion budget surplus next year rather than wallowing in deficit until 2018 or even later…

[Bill] English, now in his sixth year as New Zealand’s Treasurer, commendably chose not to emulate the world’s greatest treasurer Wayne Swan and kept a tight leash on public spending before and after the global financial crisis, preferring to cut income taxes and lift consumption tax. The Key government, facing election again later this year, is now reaping the rewards.

While Australia’s economy is lumbering back to trend growth, New Zealand is enjoying a boom, its economy predicted to grow 4 per cent this year and 3 per cent next without pushing up inflation. The country’s unemployment rate is projected to fall to 4.4 per cent during the next few years as ours hovers around 6 per cent.

Apart from a bloated public sector and a wellspring of whingeing, what does Australia get for its vastly more indulgent public spending? Much higher taxes, for one thing. The marginal income rate most Australians will pay from July — 34.5 per cent — will be higher even than New Zealand’s top 33 per cent rate, which makes a mockery of our 49 per cent top rate, which will be higher than China’s and France’s.

Read more here

Lyle Shelton: Why silence is no longer an option

From ACL:

Why silence is no longer an option

parliament house

The Greens sure are committed.

Last week in the Senate they tried and failed to remove the Lord’s Prayer from parliament.

Since 1901, the prayer has been recited at the start of each sitting day in the senate and house of representatives by the president and speaker respectively.

A group of committed pray-ers is always present in each chamber. No one is forced.

Australia did not become what it is in a vacuum. Christianity had a profound impact on the development of western institutions, including parliament.

While not everyone in Australia is Christian (although more than 60 per cent tell the census they are), nothing changes the fact that Christianity made a significant contribution to making Australia what it is today.

It is a simple fact that Christianity is part of our cultural heritage in a way that other religions are not. That is no disrespect to them. The ethics and ideas of other religions simply did not have the same impact on the formation of western values and the Australian nation.

As the pre-European peoples of this land, indigenous people, are of course a huge part of our cultural heritage. Recognition of their cultural heritage is also acknowledged in parliament each day and that is fair enough. The Greens have not sought to remove this.

Most of us would condemn the cutting down of a 113 year old tree, but when it comes to our cultural heritage the Greens are happy to fell any vestiges of the values of our past.

Greens Senator Richard Di Natale cites the separation of church and state for wanting to remove the prayer.

This misunderstanding of the concept is becoming wearisome. The Greens and others who abuse this concept are attempting to cloak their secularism in neutrality and objectivity, but in reality seem to be excluding Christianity in order to substitute their own secular irreligion.

Australia was founded with the principle of separation of church and state but it was never meant to keep religious ideas, people or even prayers out of public life.

It was simply to ensure that Australia, unlike Britain, did not have an established church constitutionally entwined with the state.

The idea was for all religions to be allowed to flourish without any being favoured by the state.

 

Read the rest here

Australian Farmers- Least Subsidised and Most Efficient

With many parts of Eastern Australia in drought, our farmers are again doing it tough and asking for emergency relief. So how do we compare with other cuntries in support for farmers?

From the ABC:

Malcolm Turnbull correct: Australian farmers among world’s least subsidised

Mr Turnbull is correct on farmers' subsidies. There’s been intense debate about the Federal Government’s refusal to subsidise General Motors and SPC Ardmona. And there are still questions about the Government stepping in to assist Qantas.

Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey has said the age of entitlement is over.

On ABC TV’s Q&A program, Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull was asked whether the Government’s hard line on subsidising the manufacturing industry also applied to agriculture.

He said: “Our farmers are among the least subsidised in the world, the least supported in the world.”

  • The claim: Malcolm Turnbull says Australian farmers are among the least subsidised in the world.
  • The verdict: Australian farmers receive subsidies of 3 per cent, ranking them the second lowest in the OECD.

ABC Fact Check examines the evidence on agricultural subsidies.

Read the full story here