61 of 74 Laws Restricting Christian Freedom Came from Labor Governments

61 of 74 Laws Restricting Christian Freedom Came from Labor Governments

From Daily Declaration

The Australian Christian Freedom Index documented 74 Acts of Parliament that have restricted Christian freedom over the past 25 years. Which parties and worldviews restrict Christian freedoms in Australia — and why?

I’ve spent a lot of time teaching people about worldviews. Because worldviews shape our actions — and Acts of Parliament.

Worldviews are our mental maps of reality — you want them to be accurate. They’re our underlying assumptions about what is true, what matters, and how the world works. Most people don’t consciously think about their worldviews, even though worldviews automate many of their actions.

For example, at footy training with many balls in the air, we often hear a warning, “Heads!” And everyone in the vicinity reels. Now the fact is, the ball can only hit one of us, yet all six of us react — because in that moment, our actions are shaped less by the fact itself than by what we believe the fact to be. Our beliefs about truth shape our worldviews, which shape our values, which shape our choices and actions.

Worldviews in Politics

Worldviews also shape actions in politics.

Some claim this only applies to religious conservatives. They complain that Christians vote according to their worldview, while progressives somehow operate from a neutral, objective place. They pressure conservatives to keep quiet about their foundational truths lest they shape their values and choices.

And yet progressives also possess foundational truth-claims, and assumptions about morality, identity, and human flourishing – and act accordingly. Yet they see no need for “separation of their beliefs and state,” because their beliefs are the state. So, their assumptions continue to shape their worldviews, their particular values, choices and actions… And sometimes those actions are Acts of Parliament.

2025 Australian Christian Freedom Index and 74 Acts of Parliament

This was in my mind as I read the Australian Christian Freedom Index 2025.

One of its more startling findings is that since 2000, Australian federal and state governments have enacted 74 Acts of Parliament that have reduced Christian freedom, with more than half of those passed in the last five years.

As someone who studies worldviews, my immediate questions were: Who passed these laws? What were their worldviews? Who do we need to avoid?

I already suspected that the decline of Christian freedom was not just the result of fewer Australians holding a Christian worldview. It was also the result of governments increasingly operating from worldviews that replaced biblical foundations with their own secular truth claims.

History repeatedly shows that belief systems moving away from biblical truths eventually regard Christianity as an irritant to be contained, marginalised or removed. For decades, we’ve seen this happen in various forms, from within Islam, ancestral animism and secular socialism.

I went looking for the worldviews behind the 74 Acts.

Which Governments Passed Acts Restricting Christian Freedom?

On pages 77 to 80 of the Australian Christian Freedom Index 2025, all 74 Acts are listed with the year they were enacted. So, I cross-checked which governments were in office at the time of each.

Who passed each, and what were their worldviews?

61 of the 74 Acts were passed by Labor governments.

8 were passed by Coalition governments generally regarded as socially moderate or progressive: Turnbull, Berejiklian, Marshall and Gutwein.

5 were passed by Coalition governments that could be described as more conservative: the Hodgman government’s Mandatory Reporting 2018, and the Marriage and Gender amendments 2018; the Morrison government’s Online Safety 2021, and the Respect at Work legislation in 2021; and the Perrottet government’s Voluntary Assisted Dying legislation in 2022. Some of these were passed under new federal constraints, and/or under pressure from progressive elements within their parties.

Labor Party Worldview

Labor openly declares itself to be a democratic socialist party, as a core objective in its Constitution (page 4).

Progressives tend in the same direction, toward moral frameworks defined by secular assumptions rather than biblical ones. Doug Wilson pointed to 1 Samuel 8:11–17 and Deuteronomy 17:15–17 as biblical warnings about governments accumulating power and overreaching their proper boundaries. The state increasingly becomes the primary authority for defining rights and social morals. Socialist Karl Marx was explicit in his criticism of the Church, the nuclear family and private property as oppressive structures.

Worldviews automate actions.

That’s why voting citizens need to learn to discern which worldviews animate which political parties.

Yet many Labor voters have no idea that Labor is socialist, let alone what that means. Some voters read the Labor party platforms, but through Christian lenses when they should read them through socialist lenses to recognise what they really mean, even as they coopt the language of human rights.

And what also tells us what they really mean are their actions. The bills they introduce, the debts they accrue and why, the harms they allow, the restrictions they introduce… the Acts of Parliament.

If we fail to name those parties and worldviews that restrict our freedoms of conscience, aren’t we giving them tacit approval, free passage toward increasing their totalitarianism?

Surely, we have already allowed too much from parties and factions animated by socialist and progressive worldviews.

Read which governments passed which of the 74 Acts restricting Christian freedom and when here.

Christian Freedom Index Launched in Australia

Watch Live: Australia’s First Christian Freedom Index Launches at Parliament House Tomorrow

The Canberra Declaration Team

From Canberra Declaration

Among the recommendations the Index puts forward is an Australian Freedoms Act that would provide enforceable nationwide protections for speech, religion, conscience and association.

Australia’s first systematic audit of Christian freedom launches at Parliament House in Canberra tomorrow morning, with preview data already showing that nine in ten Australian Christians believe it has become riskier to affirm their faith publicly than it was just five years ago.

The Australian Christian Freedom Index (ACFI) 2025 — a 108-page report produced by the Canberra Declaration in partnership with the Australian Christian Lobby, FamilyVoice Australia, the Australian Family Coalition, CitizenGo, and the Human Rights Law Alliance — will be released at a bipartisan breakfast in the Reps Alcove at 7am on Thursday 28 May.

The event will be livestreamed at the link below.

Representatives from the Labor, Liberal and National parties, along with One Nation, are expected at the event, with organisers around a dozen parliamentarians.

Seven of the report’s eleven authors will give a short speech at the launch event. Every attendee will receive a hand-signed copy of the report.

What the Report Will Show

A companion guide released ahead of tomorrow’s launch — available here — previews the report’s major findings.

The full data draws on 10,808 survey responses collected from Christians across every Australian state and territory between 27 February and 6 April this year.

Watch Live: Australia’s First Christian Freedom Index Launches at Parliament House Tomorrow

The companion guide shows perceptions of freedom varying sharply by civic domain. Respondents rated Christians as most free in church ministry and worship — the only domain where close to half rated Christians as at least somewhat free.

That figure fell to roughly one in four for evangelism, and dropped even further for Christian education and the workplace.

The lowest result was for Christian healthcare, where just 8% of respondents rated Christians as somewhat or very free to operate according to their beliefs.

Watch Live: Australia’s First Christian Freedom Index Launches at Parliament House Tomorrow

The report’s legislative audit, which covers 74 Acts across nine jurisdictions from 2000 to 2025, documents a sharp acceleration in restrictive legislation.

Victoria ranks as the most legislatively restrictive jurisdiction; Western Australia the least.

Using the eight-stage persecution scale developed by Floyd A. Brobbel of Voice of the Martyrs Canada — a scale that runs from ridicule through harassment, discrimination, defamation and attack, to detainment, torture, and martyrdom — the ACFI locates Australia’s documented cases across the first five stages.

Watch Live: Australia’s First Christian Freedom Index Launches at Parliament House Tomorrow

42 Recommendations

The report does more than document the problem: it makes 42 concrete recommendations across three audiences: parliaments, church leaders, and individual Christians.

For parliaments, the ACFI calls for an Australian Freedoms Act that would provide enforceable nationwide protections for speech, religion, conscience, and association — a positive legislative right to replace what it describes as the current patchwork of exemptions.

It also calls for restored religious hiring exemptions for faith-based schools across all jurisdictions and an end to compelled participation in abortion and assisted suicide for healthcare workers with conscientious objections.

For church leaders, the report urges public advocacy for Christians facing legal pressure, stating plainly that silence has only increased hostility.

The index also calls for the establishment of a national register of anti-Christian incidents, a mechanism that does not currently exist in Australia.

For individual Christians, the report calls on believers to maintain their public witness, engage their elected representatives, and share the findings of the report.

Most Australians — including most Christians — remain unaware of the scale of what the report documents, the companion guide notes.

Australia Betrays Israel

From The Daily Declaration

UN vote on Israel-Hamas war

Australia Betrays Israel at the United Nations

On the eve of the 76th anniversary of the proclamation of the state of Israel on 14 May 1948, Australia has betrayed the only democracy in the Middle East at the recent United Nations vote on Palestine.

On Israel’s Day of Independence or National Day, it will be asking if it has any allies in the world. Prime Minister Netanyahu has said he will go it alone if he has to so that more October 7s, promised by Hamas, will not occur and Israel can survive as a nation as it faces the existential threat from Iran and its proxies.

Egypt hails Australia's recognition of Palestine.

Egypt hails Australia’s recognition of Palestine.

Australia was the first country to vote in favour of the 1947 UN partition resolution, which led to the creation of Israel as a nation-state. Australia was the first country to recognise Israel, doing so in May 1949, and Dr Evatt of Australia presided over the vote that admitted Israel to the UN.

Arabs were given the opportunity to form their own state in the 1947 partition resolution, so Palestine could have been created then, but they rejected it, as they have every peace plan since.

Betrayal

Now our record is tarnished by Foreign Minister Penny Wong, supported by Prime Minister Albanese to recognise Palestine as a state at the UN. This is rewarding the terrorism, barbarism, murder, rape, torture and mutilation of children, women, and the elderly on October 7. It is rewarding hostage-taking, which is a war crime, as is the killing of civilians on October 7.

This is not surprising since Wong is the poster girl for Hamas and did not visit the areas where the slaughter occurred on October 7 when she visited Israel. Also, Albanese has been a supporter of Palestine since his university days.

The current Labor government has broken with years of bipartisan policy in Australia regarding Israel, put our relationship with Israel at risk and made Australia unsafe for Jewish people who have been good citizens.

The Australian government has failed to deal with the rising tide of antisemitism in Australia and allowed hate speech to prevail on our streets and in our universities.

Terrorists

pro-Israel rally

Norman listening to families of those murdered and kidnapped on October 7 at Parliament House pro-Israel rally, 28 November 2023.

Palestine does not meet the preconditions of statehood, e.g. it does not meet the obligations of the UN Charter, is not a peaceful state, does not have internationally recognised borders, and it wants the same capital as Israel – Jerusalem. There needs to be a negotiated settlement with Israel, not a unilateral declaration.

The real problem is that Palestinians do not want a two-state solution. They want a one-state solution – all of Israel from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, plus the territories they currently live in, and they will use terrorism to get it.

They are willing to turn their people into martyrs, using them as human shields, also a war crime, to win the propaganda war against Israel, falsely accusing it of genocide when they are the ones committing genocide. Nations are failing to call Hamas to account.

___

Republished with thanks to Indigenous Friends of IsraelImage courtesy of Niklas Jeromin.

Australia Day On The Farm

The elites hate this country. Woolworths refuses to promote Australia. But one farmer showed us how to make a statement even when corporate Australia wants to shut us down.

Ten Reasons All Australians Can Rejoice at the Voice Referendum Result

From The Daily Declaration:

The Daily Declaration
referendum result

Ten Reasons All Australians Can Rejoice at the Voice Referendum Result

The Yes campaign and the corporate media might be in mourning, but in truth, the referendum result is a win for all Australians. Here’s why.

The result of the weekend’s referendum was known within an hour or so of polls closing. Australians emphatically voted against constitutionally enshrining an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

Nationally, just 39.3 per cent affirmed the proposition, while a whopping 60.7 per cent made known their disapproval. Every state rejected it, along with the Northern Territory, home to the highest proportion of Indigenous residents in the nation.

The result was as definitive as the opinion polls had suggested. Once postal votes are accounted for, the No vote will likely swell some more.

The referendum debate subjected Australians to months of bickering and division. With some campaigners cynically framing the debate as a de facto empathy test or a vote on the value of Indigenous lives, the referendum took an especially heavy toll on many Aboriginal Australians.

However, as the dust settles on Saturday’s result, what are the positives all Australians can take away from our nation’s 45th referendum?

1. Indigenous Equality Reaffirmed

In 1967, over 90 per cent of Australians voted in favour of including Indigenous people in the census and empowering the federal government to legislate for Aboriginal people. That referendum took place in a decade that saw the full political equality of Aboriginal Australians affirmed, including their right to vote and stand for political office.

Almost 60 years later, Australians were effectively asked if Indigenous Australians should receive unequal political rights via a permanent race-based advisory body in Canberra. Their resounding rejection of the 2023 proposal race was a conspicuous reaffirmation of the 1967 referendum.

Thus, for more than five decades, our nation’s body politic has maintained remarkable consistency in its belief in the fundamental equality of all Australians, regardless of race. Put another way, the majority of the nation believes Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians do not need to be pandered or condescended to for the simple reason that they are already our equals.

2. National Unity Fortified

While the referendum debate was deeply divisive, the eventual outcome was clear and resounding. A hefty majority of Australians agree that there are far more constructive ways to address Indigenous disadvantage than the one recently offered.

Note that a constitutionally-enshrined advisory body in Canberra was not the only thing rejected on Saturday. The Uluru Statement from the Heart — the political manifesto behind the Voice — effectively argued for two competing Australian sovereignties.

“The invasion that started at Botany Bay is the origin of the fundamental grievance between the old and new Australians,” the document argues. “Our sovereignty preexisted the Australian state and has survived it.”

Two competing Australias, divided along ethnic lines, perpetually battling for the upper hand in Canberra? It was a recipe for an ugly but permanent national division. Whether or not most voters were aware of the Uluru Statement’s more radical aims, they have repudiated it — and future generations will thank them.

3. Identity Politics Rejected

Over the last decade, we have seen a concerted effort from many quarters to reduce people to their physical attributes, and reward or hinder them accordingly.

Identity politics is a reductionistic way of viewing the world, and an anaemic way of viewing our fellow human travellers, who are made in God’s image as one-of-a-kind individuals.

Cultural Marxism has taken this a step further, using race to categorise people as “oppressed” and “oppressor”. Western Marxists have been very successful at weaponising Indigenous people against Western institutions which — ironically — have been uniquely successful at protecting their dignity and equality in law.

It is a credit to voters and a blessing for Australia that such a strong majority have resisted this cynical ploy, choosing to view Indigenous Australians as individuals, not avatars of a political cause.

 

Read the rest of the article here

Swooping Birds And Harassing Spirits

Each year, spring time is quite hazardous in many parts of Australia. Some birds become very protective of their territories during the nesting season.

Normally placid and tame birds start to swoop pedestrians and cyclists whom they consider to be a threat. The worst among these are the Australian magpie and the plover. While they are mostly harmless, seeking to intimidate rather than injure, some individuals do make contact with people’s heads and faces.

Over recent weeks, I have been praying for the covering of the blood of Jesus when I enter a known hot spot. If a bird swoops, I command it to leave in the name of Jesus. Amazingly most of them do.

Recently I was swooped by a pair of crows, which I have never experienced before. Indignantly I told them to go and they immediately left me alone.

These are not all natural events. Some of them, if not all, are actually evil spirits that are sent specifically to harass, intimidate and distract us, even to reduce us to fear.

We might even consider them to be a sign of other events that satan is using to pull us down. If we are being attacked in a physical way, it is probably a sign that we are under spiritual attack in other areas. Sure enough there are many people in our church who are being intimidated and harassed by the enemy in various parts of their lives.

W don’t have to allow this to continue. We have been given authority over the devil and all evil spirits. Whatever realm in your live is under attack right now, surrender it to the Lord. Ask Him to cover it with the blood of Jesus and command those intimidating spirits to go in Jesus’ name.