If renewable energy really was cheaper we would not need a RET or subsidies or a plethora of rent-seeking organisations demanding quotas and subsidies. If it was free as the advocates like to tell us, the big energy companies would abandon coal technology tomorrow. If Australians really wanted more renewable energy as the Greens and Labor want to believe, we would all be ticking that little box that says “Please charge me more to use green power.”

Facts:

• Windfarms are ugly
• They produce lots less energy than it says on the box
• Their output is irregular and difficult to engineer for
• They cost more than conventional power
• They kill birds, including endangered species.

From the ABC:

Tony Abbott wants fewer ‘visually awful’ wind farms, wishes Howard government never implemented Renewable Energy Target

By environment editor Sara Phillips

Updated 34 minutes ago

PHOTO: Tony Abbott told Alan Jones he wanted to reduce the number of wind farms even further and described them as “visually awful”. (AAP: Lukas Coch, file photo)

RELATED STORY: Liberal backbencher threatens to cross floor over RET deal

MAP: Australia

Prime Minister Tony Abbott has described wind farms as “visually awful” saying he wishes the Howard government, of which he was a member, had never implemented the Renewable Energy Target (RET) policy.

“When I’ve been up close to these things, not only are they visually awful, but they make a lot of noise,” Mr Abbott told Sydney broadcaster Alan Jones this morning.

His comments echoed those of Treasurer Joe Hockey, who last year described wind turbines as “utterly offensive”.

Mr Abbott said changes before the Federal Parliament to reduce the RET were designed to prevent wind farms from further spreading across the Australian landscape.

“I would frankly have liked to reduce the number a lot more but we got the best deal we could out of the Senate,” he said.

“And if we hadn’t had a deal, Alan, we would have been stuck with even more of these things.”

The target was initially created in 2001 by John Howard and subsequently strengthened by Labor to “at least 20 per cent by 2020”, calculated at the time as being 41,000 gigawatt hours of electricity.

But energy efficiency gains since then mean that 41,000GWh would have represented a figure closer to 27 per cent of 2020 electricity needs.

Knowing what we know now, I don’t think we would have gone down this path in this way, but at the time we thought [introducing the RET] was the right way forward.

Prime Minister Tony Abbott

The Federal Government has sought to cut the target, saying it wanted one more in line with original 20 per cent target.

Changes to the RET legislating a 33,000GWh target have passed the Lower House but not the Senate — a point on which Mr Abbott appeared to be unclear.

“What we did recently in the Senate was reduce, Alan, reduce, capital R-E-D-U-C-E, we reduced the number of these thing that we’re going to get in the future,” he said.

Mr Abbott also said he would have preferred the Howard government had never created the RET in the first place.

“Knowing what we know now I don’t think we would have gone down this path in this way, but at the time we thought it was the right way forward,” he told Jones.

Opposition spokesman for the environment Mark Butler said he was “stunned” by Mr Abbott’s comments.

“Renewable energy is enormously popular in Australia,” Mr Butler said.

“People want more renewable energy, not less, because of the obvious economic and environmental benefits of creating clean energy from free resources like wind, solar and waves.”

Greens deputy leader Larissa Waters said Mr Abbott’s comments could harm the industry.

“This is the guy that’s held out — he’s trying to cut to give certainty. In fact, he’s made it clear that he doesn’t want the industry to exist at all,” Senator Waters said.

Abbott set out to destroy viable industry: Australian Wind Alliance

Australian Wind Alliance national coordinator Andrew Bray said the comments exposed the Government’s true intentions on the RET.

“These comments are extraordinary. Our Prime Minister has just admitted to setting out deliberately to destroy a viable industry in Australia, one that could provide jobs to many Australians, investment to regional communities and new income to farmers,” Mr Bray said.

“Not only that but he regrets that he wasn’t able to gut the industry even further.

“The Government has always maintained that it was cutting the RET due to an oversupply of electricity.

“But it’s obvious that rationale was just smoke and mirrors to cover up their real intent: to destroy wind energy in Australia.”

A Senate committee initiated by several independent senators is currently underway into whether wind turbines cause illness.

 

Medical reviews, including one by Australia’s premier medical research body, the National Health and Medical Research Council, have found no clear link between wind turbines and reported symptoms.